Several assigned readings are from the course textbook:
[Gregory] = Gregory, J., and S. Miller. Science in Public: Communication Culture and Credibility. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1998. ISBN: 9780306458606.
LEC # | TOPICS | READINGS | |
---|---|---|---|
Part 1: Principles (Weeks 1-4) | |||
1 | Why Bother with Science Communication? | Gregory. Chapter 1. Thomas, G., and J. R. Durant. "Why should we promote the public understanding of science?" Scientific Literary Papers 1 (1987): 1-14. ( ![]() |
|
2 | How Do Scientists Communicate with Each Other? | Medawar, Sir Peter. "Is the scientific paper a fraud?" The Listener 70 (September 12, 1963): 377-378. (PDF) Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. "A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid." Nature 171 (April 25, 1953): 737-738. ( ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
3 | How is Science Communicated to the Public? | Gregory. Chapter 4. Hilgartner, S. "The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses." Social Studies of Science 20, no. 3 (1990): 519-539. |
|
4 | Class Visit to the MIT Museum | ||
5 | Who's on the Receiving End of Popular Science? | Durant, J. R. "A New Agenda for the Public Understanding of Science." (![]() Durant, J. R., et al. "The Public Understanding of Science." Nature 340 (July 6, 1989): 11-14. National Science Board. "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding." Chapter 7 in Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2004. ![]() |
|
Part 2: Practice (Weeks 5-10) | |||
6 | Writing Science (Introduction) Science Journalism |
Gregory. pp. 104-120.![]() Einsiedel and Thorne. "Public Responses to Uncertainty." Chapter 3 in Communicating Uncertainty. Rogers, C. "The Importance of Understanding Audiences." Chapter 11 in Communicating Uncertainty. |
|
7 | Science Essay Writing |
![]() |
|
8 | Broadcasting Science (Introduction) Do Science Documentaries have a Future? |
Gregory. pp. 41-25 and 121-123.![]() |
|
9 | Making Science Shows for Radio | Talk of the Nation: Science Friday, March 31, 2006 segments. Hour One: Avian Flu Vaccine / Sleep and Teens and Hour Two: SpaceX Setback / Prescription Drug Ads. | |
10 | Exhibiting Science (Introduction) Creating Science Exhibits in the MIT Museum |
![]() |
|
11 | No Lecture | One-on-one mentoring sessions with students on their practical projects. | |
Part 3: Case Studies (Weeks 11-14) | |||
12 | Case Study 1: The Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy | Weiner, C. "The Recombinant DNA Controversy: Archival and Oral History Resources." Science, Technology & Human Values 4, no. 26 (Winter 1979): 17-19.![]() Wright, S. "Recombinant DNA Technology and Its Social Transformation, 1972-1982." Osiris 2 (1986): 303-360. (2nd series.) Goodell, R. S. "Public Involvement in the DNA Controversy: The Case of Cambridge, Massachusetts." Science, Technology & Human Values 4, no. 27 (Spring 1979): 36-43. |
|
13 | Second MIT Museum Visit | ||
14 | Case Study 2: The GM Food Debate in the UK, 1994-2004 | "Report of UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology." 1994. UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. "The Great GM Food Debate: A Survey of Media Coverage in the First Half of 1999." Report 138, House of Commons, London, UK, May 2000. (PDF) GM Nation: This Web site documents the UK national public debate about GM food and GM crops organized in 2003. |
|
15 | Case Study 3: Science, Communication and Celebrity: The Implosion of Korean Human Stem Cell Research | Kolata, G. "Scandal for Cloning Embryos: 'A Tragic Turn' for Science." New York Times, December 16, 2005. Wade, N., and Choe Sang-Hun. "Korean Research Was All Faked, Koreans Report." New York Times, January 10, 2006. Wade, N. "Lowering Expectations at Science's Frontier." New York Times, January 15, 2006. |
|
16 | Case Study 4: The Debate over 'Intelligent Design' |
Intelligent Design (Wikipedia entry) The Evolution Debate (New York Times coverage of Intelligent Design) |